Kacher wines to look forward to!

Yeah, so I never did get around to writing another blog post, or putting up tasting notes while I was in France, but we've ordered our wines based on what I tasted while I was there, so here are a few of the things that're coming in that I'm particularly excited about...

Domaine Fondreche has 3 Rhone reds named Persia, Fayard, and Nadal, all of which I thought were fantastic. I actually tried a bottle of the 04 Nadal last night and it was drinking great. All 3 of these should be priced in the mid-$20's. We'll also be getting Fondreche's 08 rose, which was suuper good, much like the 07, very light, very elegant, beautiful color, and perfumed like strawberries and roses. Fondreche is also producing a new entry-level red called Altitude 1912, a VDP Valcluse blend of Merlot, Grenache, and Syrah. It's a great value wine, should be right about $10, an everyday wine with good acidity and a nice balance of power and elegance.

From Chateau d'Or et de Gueles and Petite Cassagne, we'll be receiving all of our old favorites. The d'Or et de Gueles Costieres de Nimes Select, and the La Bolida were both outstanding, gripping and powerful wines. The Petite Cassagne Rouge is, once again, an outstanding value, the white is, if possible, even better than the '07, and the rose was one of my favorites from the whole trip.

We'll be getting 2 reds from Mas Carlot; the Grenache-Syrah, and the Mourvedre-Syrah "Enfants Terribles." I tasted multiple vintages of both of these and they are really impressive wines. We'll be getting rose from them as well.

The 08 Mas des Bressades Grenache Syrah was particularly impressive for how complete it was in it's youth. Tasting so many young wines, they can all start to blend together in your mind and taste the same. The Bressades Grenache Syrah, however, was very well-integrated, and delicious, with black tea, potpurri, and black raspberry aromatics.

There are alot more than just these, but these are the ones that I'm super-extra looking forward to. There are also Burgs, Chateaunufs, Cote Roties, and some Alsatians that I really loved, but those won't be coming for a bit longer, the wines above will be arriving in mid-May, and I just can't wait!!!

Chateau Montelena kicks ass

If you've had the misfortune of catching me on a rant about what's wrong with California wines, you know that I think many of them, particularly many that are highly regarded by certain wine publications, have too much alcohol, too little aging potential, and are not good food wines. That's why I'm always excited when I taste American wines that aren't over-alcoholic, and that will actually work with food.

I tasted 05 and 06 Napa, and 02, 03, 04, and 05 Estate Cabernet, as well as 07 Chardonnay from Chateau Montelena the other day. All of the wines were excellent. No mystery how the Chardonnay won the Paris tasting in 1976. (If you're not familiar with the tasting, rent the movie Bottle Shock.)

The standouts among the reds were the 02 and 05 estate cabs, but the 03 and 04 were both excellent, and at a $40-ish retail, both vintages of the Napa were fantastic values. Alcohol content ranged from 13.7 to 14.3, and they all worked great with beef stew. They also all showed good aging potential, which is consistent with the last bottle of Montelena Cab I had, a bottle of '86 estate which I tasted recently. At nearly 23 years old, the wine still showed marvelous fruit, structure, and acidity, and still had potential to last several more years in the bottle.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why Chateau Montelena kicks ass.

I'm thinking I might have to change my scoring system

So, the more I think about wine, the more I think I might need a bit more depth in my scoring system. I mean, the 4-point system seemed brilliant in it's simplicity when I first decided on it. After all, the Michelin Guide is the most respected restaurant guide in the world, and 3 stars is their highest rating. 3 Bicchieri is the highest rating from the Gambero Rosso. However, I keep running into situations where I've decided that a wine is a 3-Awesome wine, then I taste another one that I also think is a 3-Awesome wine, but then I have to think about whether one of them is better than the other. Plus, neither the Gambero Rosso nor the Michelin Guide ever actually give out zero stars/bicchieri. A restaurant that gets even one star from the Michelin Guide is expected to be excellent. I, on the other hand, plan on writing about wines at all different quality levels.

So, I'm thinking I need to add an Awesome. Zero Awesomes for wines that I reccomend avoiding. 1 Awesome for wines that are drinkable, but I've definitely had better. 2 Awesomes for wines that are good. Certainly there are better wines out there, but this is a wine that gets the job done. 3 Awesomes is a wine that I whole-heartedly reccomend. It's a great wine in it's category, shows good value and ageworthiness for it's price. 4 Awesomes for a wine that is absolutely classic. This is a wine that you will remember, a wine you will talk about late at night when you recount some of the greatest bottles you've had in your life. As my friend Dave would say, the kind of wine you'll tell your grandkids about.

Opinions? Comments?

Testing mobile blogging

I can blog from my phone now. Maybe now I'll do it more often.
Here's a picture of the Burgundy section of the cellar in my store.